lethargic_man: (serious)
Lethargic Man (anag.) ([personal profile] lethargic_man) wrote2007-11-25 07:12 pm

For the benefit of those of my readers who don't know this history inside-out already...

The problem with maps like this:

(linked to from this BBC news report) is that they never point out that between 1949 and 1967 the Syrians used to sit atop the supposedly demilitarised Golan Heights, and shell the Israeli farmers in the Ḥula valley below. (The Israeli farmers in their tractors couldn't hear the shells falling, so had to post boy scouts at the sides of the fields with white flags, to catch their attention.)

That is (inter alia) why the Golan Heights are so strategically important. (And vice versa: at present the Israelis can look down across the Syrian plain towards Damascus.)

[identity profile] grumpyolddog.livejournal.com 2007-11-26 10:19 am (UTC)(link)
While I really do take your point, the overwhelming feeling is still one of "dude, that was forty years ago and the rest of the world is doing its damndest to move on from this old crap".

I find myself unable condone British or American occupation of Iraq while not extending the same logical rational to Israeli occupation of the Territories. You don't nick other people's countries. That's what Gulf War 1 and even WW2 were about.