![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The problem with maps like this:
(linked to from this BBC news report) is that they never point out that between 1949 and 1967 the Syrians used to sit atop the supposedly demilitarised Golan Heights, and shell the Israeli farmers in the Ḥula valley below. (The Israeli farmers in their tractors couldn't hear the shells falling, so had to post boy scouts at the sides of the fields with white flags, to catch their attention.)
That is (inter alia) why the Golan Heights are so strategically important. (And vice versa: at present the Israelis can look down across the Syrian plain towards Damascus.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 10:19 am (UTC)I find myself unable condone British or American occupation of Iraq while not extending the same logical rational to Israeli occupation of the Territories. You don't nick other people's countries. That's what Gulf War 1 and even WW2 were about.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 10:30 am (UTC)As for the other Territories, if the Jordanians and Egyptians hadn't nicked the territory that the UN had voted for a Palestinian state sixty years ago this Thursday, the last fifty-eight years worth of conflict might not have happened. And again, I would be happy to see the West Bank handed back if I were sure this did not compromise Israeli security; which, given the P.A.'s record on the matter, I would, again, want monitored by an international force.
If all of this comes out of the process starting shortly in Annapolis, I would be happy.
Sadly, I would also be very surprised.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 11:13 am (UTC)