Lethargic Man (anag.) (
lethargic_man) wrote2006-06-19 10:37 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Cartographical knowledge poll
Where's this?

(You're not allowed to answer if you saw the threads on the other people's blogs which led to this.)

(You're not allowed to answer if you saw the threads on the other people's blogs which led to this.)
no subject
no subject
But you're thinking laterally, and that's a good start. :o)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I can think of names which have outlived their original inhabitants, but only where the same Biblical name continues to be used by with the new inhabitants, e.g. מצרים, which the original inhabitants called Khem, but the current ones, being Semites like the ancient Israelites, call Miṣr. (ObLinguisticGeeking: I wonder whether the dual form of the Hebrew name reflects memory of the union of Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt into a single kingdom...)
I'm not sure whether the name תימן is an equivalent of Yemen. (Cite me other names with T -> Y changing between Hebrew and Arabic!)
But you're right that we don't refer to places like Ashur and Aram any more, so you might be right.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's based on a map of Antarctica without the ice (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:AntarcticaRockSurface.jpg):
As the caption says, this map does not take into consideration the fact that without the ice sea levels would be higher, but Antarctica, no longer weighed down by the weight of the ice, would rise up a long way itself.
no subject
I am rather proud of myself now, you realise... hahaha.
no subject
no subject
no subject