lethargic_man: (beardy)
Lethargic Man (anag.) ([personal profile] lethargic_man) wrote2006-06-19 10:37 pm

Cartographical knowledge poll

Where's this?



(You're not allowed to answer if you saw the threads on the other people's blogs which led to this.)

[identity profile] songster.livejournal.com 2006-06-19 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Is it Pangaea?

[identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 07:03 am (UTC)(link)
Nope; here's Pangaea:

Image

But you're thinking laterally, and that's a good start. :o)
ext_60086: (Default)

[identity profile] troo.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
it's not discworld, or somesuch, is it?

[identity profile] songster.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 07:19 am (UTC)(link)
Well, it loooks to me like an ancient Earth continent - the bit at the left is South America squashed up and rotated a bit. You've got the general q shape, with the spine of the Andes down the tail. So my next guess would be Gondwanaland. images.google.com finds several versions, some quite similar to this - possibly this is a new and supposedly definitive version?

[identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 08:39 am (UTC)(link)
Nope; it's a present day continent. The answer is now at the bottom of the thread.
darcydodo: (Default)

[personal profile] darcydodo 2006-06-20 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
I keep wanting to say it's part of the Philippines, but I don't think it actually is.

[identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 06:36 am (UTC)(link)
Nope; here's the Philippines:

Image
darcydodo: (Default)

[personal profile] darcydodo 2006-06-20 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I found out what it was shortly after I originally posted, since I got to [livejournal.com profile] rysmiel's post. :)
ext_60086: (Default)

[identity profile] troo.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 06:24 am (UTC)(link)
Crete (if that's the right spelling... if not, here's the hebrew name: כרתים)?

[identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 06:34 am (UTC)(link)
Nope, that's this:

Image

[identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 07:05 am (UTC)(link)
The name I'm familiar with is the Biblical name כפתור. I wonder why they (presumably the HLA) changed it.
ext_60086: (Default)

[identity profile] troo.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 07:12 am (UTC)(link)
Probably because the people living there now aredifferent from those of 3000 years ago?

[identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com 2006-06-25 11:10 am (UTC)(link)
In order to answer this, I think I would need more information on the use of names in Hebrew: what the frequency is of names outliving the original countries or ethnic groups they referred to; how this related to whether Jews lived there or not at the time, whether the place having a clear geographical identity (e.g. an island) had any bearing on it, and so forth.

I can think of names which have outlived their original inhabitants, but only where the same Biblical name continues to be used by with the new inhabitants, e.g. מצרים, which the original inhabitants called Khem, but the current ones, being Semites like the ancient Israelites, call Miṣr. (ObLinguisticGeeking: I wonder whether the dual form of the Hebrew name reflects memory of the union of Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt into a single kingdom...)

I'm not sure whether the name תימן is an equivalent of Yemen. (Cite me other names with T -> Y changing between Hebrew and Arabic!)

But you're right that we don't refer to places like Ashur and Aram any more, so you might be right.
ext_8103: (Default)

[identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
The world with the sea level adjusted upwards by some amount and, er, the Pacific almost entirely removed for some reason? With east at the bottom.
ext_8103: (Default)

[identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 07:51 am (UTC)(link)
...maybe long timescale changes combined (?into the future) with increased sealevel?

[identity profile] ploni-bat-ploni.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 08:27 am (UTC)(link)
Without having looked at the other postings: I think it's Anarctica. (Gosh, that's a word I hadn't spelt in ages!)

[identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 08:36 am (UTC)(link)
Well done; prize jackpot to the woman in the lowermost icon!

It's based on a map of Antarctica without the ice (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:AntarcticaRockSurface.jpg):

Image

As the caption says, this map does not take into consideration the fact that without the ice sea levels would be higher, but Antarctica, no longer weighed down by the weight of the ice, would rise up a long way itself.

[livejournal.com profile] james_nicoll mused (http://james-nicoll.livejournal.com/377153.html?thread=3821633#t3821633):
I bet if one deleted the map of the continental shelf, few people would recognise it.
So I did that, and rotated it to throw people off further, and it looks like he was right. :o)

[identity profile] ploni-bat-ploni.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 08:45 am (UTC)(link)
Woohoo! My A Level Geography did pay off! :-D

I am rather proud of myself now, you realise... hahaha.

[identity profile] songster.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 08:50 am (UTC)(link)
Meh, that was also a thought. I was just convinced I was on the right track with it not being present-day.

[identity profile] green-knight.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 10:22 am (UTC)(link)
I got it and then found it confirmed on my f-list before I could write the answer. It's way way cool. Particularly as there used to be a totally whacko cartographic theory relating to 'antarctica without ice' and it looked nothing like this.

[identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com 2006-06-20 10:34 am (UTC)(link)
Now what I'd like to see is the same done for Greenland.