Here is the basis for one of the things we mourn on the minor fast of
the seventeenth of Tammuz (VI.2)
( Read more... )
The other date we associate with this period is that the Destruction of the
Temple, of course, the ninth of Av (VI.4):
( Read more... )
Hang on a tick: the
tenth of Av? Perhaps then it was
the
First Temple which was destroyed on the ninth of Av?
| 2 Kings 25:8-9 |
מלכים ב כה ח-ט |
|
And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month, which
is the nineteenth year of king Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon,
came Nebuzaradan, captain of the guard, a servant of the king
of Babylon, unto Jerusalem:
And he burnt the house of the LORD, and the king's house, and
all the houses of Jerusalem, and every great man's house burnt
he with fire.
|
וּבַחֹדֶשׁ הַחֲמִישִׁי בְּשִׁבְעָה לַחֹדֶשׁ הִיא שְׁנַת תְּשַׁע־עֶשְׂרֵה שָׁנָה לַמֶּלֶךְ נְבֻכַדְנֶאצַּר מֶלֶךְ־בָּבֶל בָּא נְבוּזַרְאֲדָן רַב־טַבָּחִים עֶבֶד מֶלֶךְ־בָּבֶל יְרוּשָׁלִָם׃
וַיִּשְׂרֹף אֶת־בֵּית־ה׳ וְאֶת־בֵּית הַמֶּלֶךְ וְאֵת כָּל־בָּתֵּי יְרוּשָׁלִַם וְאֶת־כָּל־בֵּית גָּדוֹל שָׂרַף בָּאֵשׁ׃
|
Maybe not, then: The Book of Kings seems to claim it was the
seventh
of Av. But Jeremiah also wrote an account of that. What date does he give?
| Jeremiah 52:12-13 |
ירמיהו נב יב-יג |
|
Now in the fifth month, in the tenth day of the month, which
was the nineteenth year of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon,
came Nebuzaradan, captain of the guard, which served the king
of Babylon, into Jerusalem,
And burned the house of the LORD, and the king's house; and
all the houses of Jerusalem, and all the houses of the great
men, burned he with fire:
|
וּבַחֹדֶשׁ הַחֲמִישִׁי בֶּעָשׂוֹר לַחֹדֶשׁ הִיא שְׁנַת תְּשַׁע־עֶשְׂרֵה שָׁנָה לַמֶּלֶךְ נְבוּכַדְרֶאצַּר מֶלֶךְ־בָּבֶל בָּא נְבוּזַרְאֲדָן רַב־טַבָּחִים עָמַד לִפְנֵי מֶלֶךְ־בָּבֶל בִּירוּשָׁלִָם׃
וַיִּשְׂרֹף אֶת־בֵּית־ה׳ וְאֶת־בֵּית הַמֶּלֶךְ וְאֵת כָּל־בָּתֵּי יְרוּשָׁלִַם וְאֶת־כָּל־בֵּית הַגָּדוֹל שָׂרַף בָּאֵשׁ׃
|
He says it was the tenth! So where on earth does the traditional date of the
ninth come from? I've heard the rabbis of the Talmud said Jeremiah was so
upset at the Destruction he put the wrong date down, but that's no answer to
satisfy me! This page pointed
me at the Talmud's answer:
| Taanit 29a |
א כט תענית |
|
How then are these dates to be reconciled? ( Read more... )
|
ותניא אי אפשר לומר בשבעה שהרי כבר נאמר בעשור ואי
אפשר לומר בעשור שהרי כבר נאמר בשבעה׃
( Read more... )
|
My feelings are with Rabbi Yoḥānān on this issue.
Of course, it's not only the Temple that was destroyed in these fateful
days; it's heartbreaking also to read of the destruction of the towers that
had for so long marked the Jerusalem skyline: ( Read more... )
As I mentioned in my review, Josephus has the brand that set the Temple
alight hurled by a soldier in defiance of Titus's wishes, and Titus then try
and have the flames put out, only for his orders to go unheard in the
hurly-burly. He concludes (VI.4):
And thus was the holy house burnt down, without Caesar's approbation.
I'm of the opinion, however, that Titus was at the absolute least
concupiscent in the destruction of the Temple; Josephus lies here, because
Titus is his patron by the time he's writing this, and he can't risk offending
him.
Afterwards (VI.6):
All the soldiers had such vast quantities of the spoils which they had gotten
by plunder, that in Syria a pound weight of gold was sold for half its former
value.
The Colosseum in Rome was built with the proceeds from the plunder of Judaea.
That building is a monument to the death and exile of countless Jews and the
wrecking of their homeland, and it makes me very angry to walk into it nowadays
and see a big crucifix commemorating the Christian martyrs whose death their at
the hands of wild beasts there is not a shred of evidence for. (There is in
other amphitheatres, but not the Colosseum).
Josephus
notes
Jewish learning notes index