Prayer <strike>for</strike> about the Royal Family
Thursday, September 16th, 2010 10:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Last Shabbos I was gabbai in Assif, and couldn't resist, at the point where United Synagogue shuls read the Prayer for the Royal Family, interjecting:
Well, it's the Ten Days of Repentance; I've got to have something to repent for...A Prayer about the Royal Family
Mortal king decays and descends to the grave,Or at least, that's what it says in the Rosh Hashana liturgy. *ahem* Prayer for the Government...
Weary and restless; how long shall this one reign?
Mortal king is overcome by deep slumber,
Struck by things of naught; how long shall this one reign?
But the King Most High—
He is the faithful Judge, whose actions are true,
Ever proving kind, rich in mercy and truth,
His path is endless truth and his seal is truth,
He shall reign supreme forever and ever.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-17 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-19 08:45 am (UTC)stuff I learned from margavriel
Date: 2010-09-19 03:21 pm (UTC)Anyway, you know how ונתנה תוקף was inserted into the liturgy relatively late? This piece about the poor king used to be in that spot, along with a depressing piyyut about how Adam couldn't even keep one commandment, so what hope do we have of 613. Plus a more upbeat one where God sits on the Throne of Judgement and all the angels agree that man deserves destruction, but God gets up and moves to the Throne of Mercy and pardons everyone anyway. Apparently all this was considered too uncomfortable for people suffering persecution, and probably too political as it could easily be read as critical of the authorities. Cool, ne?
Re: stuff I learned from margavriel
Date: 2010-09-22 11:20 am (UTC)I think you somewhat overestimate my level of Hebrew!
Anyway, you know how ונתנה תוקף was inserted into the liturgy relatively late?
No, I didn't know that. (What do you mean by relatively late?)
This piece about the poor king used to be in that spot,
Well, just beforehand according to your link above. (The point being that the inclusion of ונתנה תוקף after the lineובכן לך תעלה קדושה is significant to the story that accompanies it.)
along with a depressing piyyut about how Adam couldn't even keep one commandment, so what hope do we have of 613. Plus a more upbeat one where God sits on the Throne of Judgement and all the angels agree that man deserves destruction, but God gets up and moves to the Throne of Mercy and pardons everyone anyway. Apparently all this was considered too uncomfortable for people suffering persecution, and probably too political as it could easily be read as critical of the authorities. Cool, ne?
How did you learn all this?
Re: stuff I learned from margavriel
Date: 2010-09-24 11:29 am (UTC)Eh, 12th or 13th century, I think? I thought everybody knew the legend about what's-his-name composing it / receiving it as direct inspiration when he was on his way to be martyred. If you don't, I should look up the details for you.
I thought I said,
Re: stuff I learned from margavriel
Date: 2010-09-25 07:07 pm (UTC)Of course I did; that's the significance of it being inserted after ובכן לך תעלה קדושה, because that's when R. Amnon realised he was about to die. (As for everyone knowing it,
I thought I said,
You said he taught you the piyut מלך אביון; I didn't realise he taught you all this extra stuff too.
If you didn't know, he's doing a PhD on the literature of piyyutim, so he really knows this stuff.
No, I didn't know that.
Are you a republican?
Date: 2010-09-19 05:31 pm (UTC)Only shul where I ever did not hear prayer for R F, was Chabad.
Re: Are you a republican?
Date: 2010-09-19 05:33 pm (UTC)Sorry my name is Steven
Re: Are you a republican?
Date: 2010-09-19 05:44 pm (UTC)As regards my personal views, long live the Queen!—she's the only thing keeping Charlie boy off the throne. If I had my druthers, I'd change the succession law from primogeniture to tanistry—the old Irish system in which the nobles (or, in a modern state, I would imagine either parliament or the electorate) chose as the new king the member of the royal family best able to do the job.
I wouldn't get rid of the monarchy altogether—they bring in a lot of tourist dollars—but I would severely cut down the number of royals with roles to play representing the Queen. Other countries have a President and a First Lady; why do we have to support an entire family?
Re: Are you a republican?
Date: 2010-09-19 07:03 pm (UTC)Actually I was at NNLS, for Rosh Hashanah, and do recall now the different wording.
Steven
Re: Are you a republican?
Date: 2010-09-19 07:06 pm (UTC)Re: Are you a republican?
Date: 2010-09-19 07:55 pm (UTC)I dont give my full name online, though do remember you from Marom days.